Okay, for those who cared enough to keep up with the VH-1 circus that was I Love New York, you know that she ended up picking this dude named Tango. When he was picked, he even took a knee and gave her a "promise ring" and the whole nine. Everything seemed wonderful and fine until the reunion show. There, Tango revealed to New York and the viewing public that he did not like some of the comments New York and her mother made about Tango's mom and some of his characteristics. This led to him blowing her off and walking off stage in what had obviously been a build up of emotion. New York and Tango cursed at each other in a flurry of network censored bleeps as he left the set. Boo hoo, wah wah, we were only worried for a second. Why? Cuz though she pledged she would only do this once, there is indeed an I Love New York 2 in the works. I guess media whores just can't get enough of that bug...
The arguement is not my problem. My problem was with one of the things that New York said during the televised breakup. She said something to the effect of "Fuck you with your two-inch muthafuckin' dick" and proceeded to make the "little penis" hand guesture. THIS. THIS is where my problem lies.
The problem is that this is not only an issue that has plagued Miss Tiffany Pollard. Females of all makes, models, and cultures find themselves victim of being with someone who they feel is sexually inadequate, yet nothing is mentioned about it until a breakup. These people seem to be perfectly willing to live with their subpar body parts or performance for as long as their relationship will allow. In the breakup arguement and the post-relationship slander, though, it's almost as if these lovebirds switch faces, as their private exploits become smear campaigns, their shortcomings (so to speak) being the paramount conversation pieces.
What is it about a person where they can allow themselves to be consistently involved with a person who is not up to their standards for what could be YEARS and willingly go along with it? Why not just stop from time 1 and not start what could be a detrimental streak by not being involved there? Is it actually about being dissatisfied with that person or are you acting out of being hurt? Does desperation lead to boasts of a hyperbolic nature?
Just me, but it seems that making such claims makes that woman look like more of a doofus that the slandered man. It seems to send a message that she is willing to put up with whatever while in a relationship, whether she likes it or not. Maybe they should think twice about the 4 fingers that are pointing to themselves while they are pointing a finger at him. Things that make you go "hmmmmm..."
-B
Posts
1 comment:
I am so glad I read this and sooo mad Im so late (lol).
First off, sorry to say but this sitution I been in. When you are "in love" with a person 9 times out of 10 it doesnt matter about his performance in bed. If you actually get to know a person before you hop in bed with him, you find yourself falling in love more with HIM and not his SEX.
Most women will through it back in your face at time of break up, because they are hurt and you have just embarrassed them, so they are going to do anything they can to embarrass you as well.
My situation, I was knowing this guy for for 4 yrs and counting and we had never had sex within that time. When we did I was very disappointed with that area of pleasure, but it didnt matter because I was "in love" with him, for his conversation, his spiritual thoughts, the way he treated me, the way we got along, and all that other mushy stuff.But I never threw it up in his face even tho we had our problems. That just isnt me.
Got it schmoopy???
Post a Comment